Facing federal crime charges and navigating the defense process can be overwhelming and emotionally challenging. A Michigan federal crimes lawyer is a crucial asset who can help you work through the criminal defense process. A federal criminal defense attorney can support you with the following:
Overall, a federal criminal defense lawyer can leverage their knowledge of complicated federal laws to help you navigate the criminal defense process. Whether you are facing charges or have already been convicted, they can represent your interests, ensuring your rights are protected. Given the high stakes of federal cases, having a fierce and experienced federal lawyer who can advocate on your behalf is critical.
It is a common misconception that federal cases are more serious or more complicated than state cases. Hence the term, “Don’t make a federal case out of it.” While that is often true, that’s not what makes a criminal case federal. Federal cases involve violations of federal law and matters of federal jurisdiction. Many state cases are more “serious” than federal cases, including murder.
Certain offenses can be charged as either federal or state crimes, and federal and state prosecutors often work together to decide who will take the case. Cases that end up in federal court usually result in higher sentences than they would in state court because of federal mandatory minimum and maximum sentencing laws, as well as the federal sentencing guidelines. Federal cases are prosecuted by the local United States Attorney’s Office, whereas state cases are generally handled by the county prosecutor’s office.
Some common types of federal criminal charges include:
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a federal law that was signed and implemented in 1970 as a response to organized crime in the United States. Under RICO, defendants have the potential to face severe criminal penalties and potential civil suits for acts that are committed under the umbrella of a larger-scale criminal organization.
Under RICO, racketeering activity is defined as “predicate offenses,” which include activities such as kidnapping, bribery, money laundering, extortion, drug trafficking, gambling, and obstruction of justice. RICO crimes are severely penalized, with heavy prison sentences associated with each racketeering count, hefty fines, and required forfeiture of any property or assets acquired through means of racketeering.
A criminal pattern of behavior must be shown by prosecutors to charge someone under RICO. This means that within a 10-year period, it will need to be shown that they carried out at least two acts related to racketeering activity. If you are facing RICO charges, an experienced federal criminal defense lawyer can work to defend your charges by proving that no such patterns exist.
Individuals harmed by racketeering activities can file civil lawsuits under RICO against individuals or organizations, seeking financial damages. RICO cases can be extremely damaging for defendants. Therefore, it is critical to work with an experienced federal criminal defense lawyer who has a background as a federal prosecutor. They can bring their experience building federal cases to strengthen your defense, anticipating legal tactics and tricks.
National security and terrorism crimes are serious charges that include violent acts or threats carried out to coerce or intimidate civilians or governments under the premise of reaching certain ideological, religious, or political objectives. At the federal level, terrorism and national security crimes are heavily investigated, prosecuted, and result in convictions, necessitating robust criminal defense legal representation.
Legal frameworks, including the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Patriot Act, and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), lay the federal groundwork for investigating and processing such crimes. Under these acts, the federal government is given broad discretion to collect intelligence. If you believe you are under investigation, an experienced criminal defense lawyer can work to protect your rights and interests.
Terrorism charges can be broken down into international or domestic terrorism acts. Domestic terrorism constitutes acts of terror carried out by groups or people based in the United States who target government agencies or civil groups in the country. International terrorism is carried out by people or groups based outside of the country who attempt to target foreign nationals or agencies.
Acts of terror include hijackings, kidnappings, the use of explosives, bombing, assassinations, and cyber-terrorism. Individuals who are implicated in supporting acts of terrorism, such as through financing terror acts or recruiting or hiding terrorists, can face federal charges. If you have been charged with committing a terrorist act, you can be facing severe criminal penalties. Therefore, it is critical to contact an experienced criminal defense lawyer as soon as possible.
Individuals who are accused of sabotaging government operations, disclosing classified information without authorization, or spying can be charged with committing national security crimes. As national security crimes are heavily penalized, it is critical to work with a skilled federal criminal defense lawyer. They can ensure your privacy throughout your case, managing the media and investigators to protect your rights and interests.
Some reasons a federal prosecutor may decide to take a case rather than letting the state bring charges include whether the case involves:
Federal charges can be initiated in one of three ways: a grand jury “indictment,” an “information,” or a “criminal complaint.” In federal felony cases, the United States Constitution requires that the prosecutor present the case to a grand jury to decide whether charges should be issued. A grand jury is composed of 16-23 members of the public who are called to serve on jury duty. Sometimes federal prosecutors use a criminal complaint or felony information as a faster way to issue charges — particularly when a grand jury is not in session. Eventually, the prosecutor must still bring the case before the grand jury within a certain amount of time unless the defendant waives the right to have a grand jury review the charges. The grand jury is supposed to serve as a checkpoint to review federal charges, hear from witnesses, and ask questions before criminal charges are issued in an indictment.
All three methods (indictment, information, and criminal complaint) require the same level of proof to bring charges: probable cause that a crime has been committed, although only indictments have been reviewed by a grand jury.
In a federal investigation, the US Attorney’s Office will sometimes notify the person in advance that they are under investigation, such as through a target letter, and offer them the opportunity to “proffer” by coming in for an interview with a federal law enforcement agency (like the FBI) and the federal prosecutor handling the case. This is a way for the prosecutor to determine whether or not to proceed with the case and whether to give the person a benefit for cooperating. This situation must be approached with caution, and attending proffers with legal counsel is highly advised because it often requires the person under investigation to admit to crimes under federal law. It often leads to someone pleading guilty as part of a plea deal before charges are actually brought. Early cooperation like this can sometimes be the best way to limit potential exposure to significant federal prison time, instead of waiting for charges to be issued or going to trial.
Once the federal government brings charges, getting them dismissed is very hard. Unlike county prosecutors’ offices, which bring a large volume of new cases to court every day, the US Attorney’s Office works on fewer cases at a time, does a generally more thorough investigation, and brings charges that it is confident it can prove at trial beyond a reasonable doubt. However, just because federal charges have been brought does not mean the person will be convicted. Federal criminal defense attorneys can challenge and sometimes defeat charges by contesting the validity of any traffic stop, arrest, search warrant, or statement made by the defendant. Often, state and local law enforcement agencies will be the first people involved in an arrest or search, and there are often solid arguments that what they did violated the Fourth or Fifth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unlawful searches and seizures. The Fifth Amendment protects people from having to answer law enforcement questions that incriminate them. A motion to suppress evidence or statements is often the best way to challenge federal charges.
If a pretrial motion does not result in dismissal, acquittal by a jury at trial is not unheard of in the federal system. Jurors are savvy and are often skeptical of overly aggressive police tactics or sloppy investigations. If a resolution cannot be reached with the prosecutor before trial, a trial can be a successful approach in the right case.
For anyone convicted of a federal crime — whether through a guilty plea or a jury trial — the potential sentences are high. In federal court, the judge must calculate and consider the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG). The guidelines are calculated by a combination of factors, including the person’s prior criminal history and key aspects of the offense of conviction (such as the loss amount in a financial crime or the drug quantity in a drug case). In addition to the offense conduct, the court must consider “relevant conduct,” which can include conduct the person was never even charged with, as well as dismissed counts. For example, if a person pleads guilty to possessing drugs with the intent to distribute them, and the prosecutor dismisses certain counts involving other drugs, the guidelines will still be calculated using all the drugs from all the charges as “relevant conduct.” Similarly, if a person pleads guilty to health care fraud on one date, the financial loss amount for all fraud dates will be counted in the guidelines. At sentencing, the government must only prove contested facts by a “preponderance of the evidence” (> 50%), as opposed to “beyond a reasonable doubt” at trial. The main benefit of pleading guilty in a federal case is the two-level reduction in the guideline’s calculation for “acceptance of responsibility” when the person fully admits culpability for the crime to which they pleaded guilty, and the additional one-level reduction for a “timely plea” before the plea deadline.
The sentencing guidelines produce a range of time recommended for incarceration. The judge must consider this sentencing range but can go above or below for an articulated reason. The main reason a judge will go above or below the guidelines range is the defendant’s level of remorse or lack thereof, and actions they have taken (good and bad) since the offense occurred.
Collectively, they have litigated thousands of federal cases and appeared many times before federal appellate courts. They bring their expertise as former federal prosecutors, FBI special agents, and Army JAGs to help clients navigate the fear and complexity of a federal case. They are adept at advising clients throughout the process, negotiating favorable resolutions, and presenting jury cases at trial.
Contact SBBL Law today to get support from a Michigan federal crime lawyer.
Our criminal lawyers represent clients in nationwide federal criminal cases and Title IX investigations, and we regularly appear in courts throughout Michigan:
If you or someone you know is looking for a criminal defense attorney, call now for a free consultation (616) 458-5500 or (231) 924-8700 or connect with us online.
60 MONROE CENTER ST NW #500
GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503
28 W. MAIN STREET
FREMONT, MI 49412